Bicycles: Difference between revisions
Added links to deficient bicycle facilities |
Filling out introduction. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Best practices around the construction of bicycle facilities in North America has been rapidly evolving as cities and states continue to improve older designs, experiment with new ones, and adapt international strategies. This page aims to document current best practices in a simple, easy to understand format, while still allowing space for extensive discussion about known advantages and disadvantages of various designs. | Bicycles and other forms of micromobility are an affordable, healthy, safe and low impact way to travel. Providing people with the option of getting around by bike is a cost effective way of improving public health, reducing congestion, improving quality of life, affordability, and learning outcomes for children in school among other things. Best practices around the construction of bicycle facilities in North America has been rapidly evolving as cities and states continue to improve older designs, experiment with new ones, and adapt international strategies. This page aims to document current best practices in a simple, easy to understand format, while still allowing space for extensive discussion about known advantages and disadvantages of various designs. | ||
Designers should strive to create roadways that are safe for '''all ages and abilities''' (AA&A) using any type of [[wikipedia:Micromobility|micromobility]] device. From young children heading to their friend's house to seniors visiting the doctor | Designers should strive to create roadways that are safe for '''all ages and abilities''' (AA&A) using any type of [[wikipedia:Micromobility|micromobility]] device. From young children heading to their friend's house to seniors visiting the doctor — from upright city bikes to fat tire ebikes — every road user should be safe and comfortable getting where they need to go. | ||
== Network Planning == | == Network Planning == | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
There are countless feasible designs for AA&A bicycle facilities, but most fall into one of the following categories: | There are countless feasible designs for AA&A bicycle facilities, but most fall into one of the following categories: | ||
=== [[Bike | === [[Bike Path|Paths]] === | ||
Dedicated car-free bikeway, often shared with pedestrians. | Dedicated car-free bikeway, often shared with pedestrians. | ||
=== [[Separated Bike Lanes]] === | === [[Separated Bike Lane|Separated Bike Lanes]] === | ||
Dedicated lanes separated from motor vehicles by a vertical barrier. | Dedicated lanes separated from motor vehicles by a vertical barrier. | ||
=== [[Constrained Bike Lanes]] === | === [[Constrained Bike Lane|Constrained Bike Lanes]] === | ||
The traditional North American 'bike lane'. These are generally not recommended unless there are right-of-way constraints or the project is repurposing existing pavement. | The traditional North American 'bike lane'. These are generally not recommended unless there are right-of-way constraints or the project is repurposing existing pavement. | ||
=== [[Advisory Bike Lanes]] === | === [[Advisory Bike Lane|Advisory Bike Lanes]] === | ||
Rare in North America - a compact design that can be used on roadways where management strategies ensure low speeds and traffic volumes. | Rare in North America - a compact design that can be used on roadways where management strategies ensure low speeds and traffic volumes. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
May older designs for bicycle facilities are no longer recommended because they do not effectively and safely serve users of all ages and abilities. Some of these designs are listed here: | May older designs for bicycle facilities are no longer recommended because they do not effectively and safely serve users of all ages and abilities. Some of these designs are listed here: | ||
=== [[Sharrows]] === | === [[Sharrow|Sharrows]] === | ||
Road marking showing where bicycles are supposed to ride on the road. These have been extensively used on roads that are not AA&A compatible, but are fine as part of a bike boulevard or shared space design. | Road marking showing where bicycles are supposed to ride on the road. These have been extensively used on roads that are not AA&A compatible, but are fine as part of a bike boulevard or shared space design. | ||
=== Bicycles on Sidewalks === | === Bicycles on Sidewalks === | ||
Designing a roadway where bicycles are expected to use the sidewalk creates a multitude of conflicts and potential safety hazards. In cases where this is planned, the sidewalk can be upgraded to a [[Bike Paths|multi-use path]]. It is always better to segregate micromobility users from pedestrians, however. | Designing a roadway where bicycles are expected to use the sidewalk creates a multitude of conflicts and potential safety hazards. In cases where this is planned, the sidewalk can be upgraded to a [[Bike Paths|multi-use path]]. It is always better to segregate micromobility users from pedestrians, however. | ||
Latest revision as of 01:04, 15 May 2026
Bicycles and other forms of micromobility are an affordable, healthy, safe and low impact way to travel. Providing people with the option of getting around by bike is a cost effective way of improving public health, reducing congestion, improving quality of life, affordability, and learning outcomes for children in school among other things. Best practices around the construction of bicycle facilities in North America has been rapidly evolving as cities and states continue to improve older designs, experiment with new ones, and adapt international strategies. This page aims to document current best practices in a simple, easy to understand format, while still allowing space for extensive discussion about known advantages and disadvantages of various designs.
Designers should strive to create roadways that are safe for all ages and abilities (AA&A) using any type of micromobility device. From young children heading to their friend's house to seniors visiting the doctor — from upright city bikes to fat tire ebikes — every road user should be safe and comfortable getting where they need to go.
Network Planning[edit | edit source]
Bikeway Facility Types[edit | edit source]
There are countless feasible designs for AA&A bicycle facilities, but most fall into one of the following categories:
Paths[edit | edit source]
Dedicated car-free bikeway, often shared with pedestrians.
Separated Bike Lanes[edit | edit source]
Dedicated lanes separated from motor vehicles by a vertical barrier.
Constrained Bike Lanes[edit | edit source]
The traditional North American 'bike lane'. These are generally not recommended unless there are right-of-way constraints or the project is repurposing existing pavement.
Advisory Bike Lanes[edit | edit source]
Rare in North America - a compact design that can be used on roadways where management strategies ensure low speeds and traffic volumes.
Bike Boulevard[edit | edit source]
Roadway configuration in which the entire road functions as a bike path. Requires management of vehicle speeds and volumes. Best for when a bike route is routed down an urban or suburban street, and there isn't enough space for safe separated bike lanes.
[edit | edit source]
Most urban and suburban streets.
Deficient Bicycle Facilities[edit | edit source]
May older designs for bicycle facilities are no longer recommended because they do not effectively and safely serve users of all ages and abilities. Some of these designs are listed here:
Sharrows[edit | edit source]
Road marking showing where bicycles are supposed to ride on the road. These have been extensively used on roads that are not AA&A compatible, but are fine as part of a bike boulevard or shared space design.
Bicycles on Sidewalks[edit | edit source]
Designing a roadway where bicycles are expected to use the sidewalk creates a multitude of conflicts and potential safety hazards. In cases where this is planned, the sidewalk can be upgraded to a multi-use path. It is always better to segregate micromobility users from pedestrians, however.